Hubris?

For fan discussion of the Vanderbilt Commodore baseball program.

Moderators: kerrigjl, BrentVU, jfgogold, NateSY, KarenYates, Vandyman74, roanoke, VandyWhit

Levon
Rear Admiral
Posts: 2343
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:24 am
Been thanked: 50 times

Hubris?

Post by Levon »

In the top of the 1st, the UT 3rd base coach had a runner tag up for home on a very short, very high fly to LF; easily gunned down at home, not even close enough for a slide. The Stanford pitcher is coming off his 156 pitch game in the Supers and his pitches did not have much movement in the 1st; UT hitting him. Really bad decision to send the runner into an inning-ending 7-2 DP. Stanford now up on Dollander 2-0, still hitting in bottom of 1st.


User avatar
cjdore
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 10024
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 10:13 am
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Hubris?

Post by cjdore »

Up 4-0 now top of 4th.
Levon
Rear Admiral
Posts: 2343
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:24 am
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Hubris?

Post by Levon »

Dollander isn't very sharp today, and since the 1st, UT hitters look a bit befuddled by scrawny (but very good) Stanford pitcher.
MrMemorial
Rear Admiral
Posts: 2016
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: Hubris?

Post by MrMemorial »

Zoolander left down 4-0 after three. If Stanford finishes the deal he will finish the season a pedestrian 7-7 for the season.
Levon
Rear Admiral
Posts: 2343
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:24 am
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Hubris?

Post by Levon »

MrMemorial wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 2:26 pm Zoolander left down 4-0 after three. If Stanford finishes the deal he will finish the season a pedestrian 7-7 for the season.
"Zoolander" :lol:
Levon
Rear Admiral
Posts: 2343
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:24 am
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Hubris?

Post by Levon »

Levon wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 2:13 pm Dollander isn't very sharp today, and since the 1st, UT hitters look a bit befuddled by scrawny (but very good) Stanford pitcher.
Vols have figured the skinny guy out. Bunch of singles, a walk and a sac fly have chased him with 2 outs and the bases loaded in top 5th, tied 4-4. Yikes!
Doubledore
Lieutenant
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 12:12 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Hubris?

Post by Doubledore »

Levon wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 2:49 pm
Levon wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 2:13 pm Dollander isn't very sharp today, and since the 1st, UT hitters look a bit befuddled by scrawny (but very good) Stanford pitcher.
Vols have figured the skinny guy out. Bunch of singles, a walk and a sac fly have chased him with 2 outs and the bases loaded in top 5th, tied 4-4. Yikes!
Stanford coach made a Corbs like decision to leave his pitcher in way too long - now they will lose for sure.
vutrain
Commander
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:43 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Hubris?

Post by vutrain »

Doubledore wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 3:48 pm
Levon wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 2:49 pm
Levon wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 2:13 pm Dollander isn't very sharp today, and since the 1st, UT hitters look a bit befuddled by scrawny (but very good) Stanford pitcher.
Vols have figured the skinny guy out. Bunch of singles, a walk and a sac fly have chased him with 2 outs and the bases loaded in top 5th, tied 4-4. Yikes!
Stanford coach made a Corbs like decision to leave his pitcher in way too long - now they will lose for sure.
Well Crap.
MrMemorial
Rear Admiral
Posts: 2016
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: Hubris?

Post by MrMemorial »

Doubledore wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 3:48 pm
Levon wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 2:49 pm
Levon wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 2:13 pm Dollander isn't very sharp today, and since the 1st, UT hitters look a bit befuddled by scrawny (but very good) Stanford pitcher.
Vols have figured the skinny guy out. Bunch of singles, a walk and a sac fly have chased him with 2 outs and the bases loaded in top 5th, tied 4-4. Yikes!
Stanford coach made a Corbs like decision to leave his pitcher in way too long - now they will lose for sure.
They had a guy in the bullpen ready when the score was 4-1. The Stanford coach much have gotten up on the wrong side of the bed to leave the pitcher in that long when he was fading out. Not sure what point he was trying to make.
Levon
Rear Admiral
Posts: 2343
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:24 am
Been thanked: 50 times

Re: Hubris?

Post by Levon »

MrMemorial wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 4:31 pm
Doubledore wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 3:48 pm
Levon wrote: Mon Jun 19, 2023 2:49 pm

Vols have figured the skinny guy out. Bunch of singles, a walk and a sac fly have chased him with 2 outs and the bases loaded in top 5th, tied 4-4. Yikes!
Stanford coach made a Corbs like decision to leave his pitcher in way too long - now they will lose for sure.
They had a guy in the bullpen ready when the score was 4-1. The Stanford coach much have gotten up on the wrong side of the bed to leave the pitcher in that long when he was fading out. Not sure what point he was trying to make.
The starter had clearly lost it in the 5th, and to UT's credit by that point, they just hit the pitches thrown but didn't try to kill them. Stanford skipper must've had visions of another 156 pitch masterpiece to save his staff for the run thru the loser bracket. Poor decision making on his part.

Tenn advances, but their three best pitchers are done for this week. If they manage to beat LSU and/or Wake three times in the next 3 days with depleted pitching, then you gotta tip the cap to 'em.
User avatar
Versus75
Admiral
Posts: 7821
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 12:19 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Strikeout to end Top 5

Post by Versus75 »

I certainly was not rooting for Tennessee and was glad to see the play called as it was ... however, I didn't understand why Denton could not run to first base.

TWO OUTS, Bases loaded. Denton swings and misses, the ball gets away from the catcher, and a runner from third crosses the plate.

Doesn't the defense have to make a play? Tag the runner or tag the batter or throw to first base for the out?

My understanding is that the batter is automatically out only if there is a runner on first base with less than two out (rationale is much like the Infield Fly Rule in which defense could drop the ball on purpose and start a double play).

And if the runner touches home plate before a play is made at first base is that considered a force-out in which the run doesn't count?

In this case, the umpire called the batter out and there was no play. The ball was definitely not held by the catcher.
Locked Previous topicNext topic